XXX Chats

Facetime with hot wemon

Carbon dating hoax

From his research, our evolutionary geologist may have discovered that other geologists believe that Sedimentary Rocks A are 200 million years old and Sedimentary Rocks B are 30 million years old.

Thus, he already ‘knows’ that the igneous dyke must be younger than 200 million years and older than 30 million years.

On his return, he sends his sample to the laboratory for dating, and after a few weeks receives the lab report.by Tas Walker A geologist works out the relative age of a rock by carefully studying where the rock is found in the field.The field relationships, as they are called, are of primary importance and all radiometric dates are evaluated against them.He may suggest that some other very old material had contaminated the lava as it passed through the earth.Or he may suggest that the result was due to a characteristic of the lava—that the dyke had inherited an old ‘age’. 200.4 ± 3.2 million years) implies that the calculated date of 200.4 million years is accurate to plus or minus 3.2 million years.It is clear that the sedimentary rock was deposited and folded before the dyke was squeezed into place.By looking at other outcrops in the area, our geologist is able to draw a geological map which records how the rocks are related to each other in the field.’ In fact, there is a whole range of standard explanations that geologists use to ‘interpret’ radiometric dating results.Someone may ask, ‘Why do geologists still use radiometric dating?In the same way, by identifying fossils, he may have related Sedimentary Rocks B with some other rocks.Creationists would generally agree with the above methods and use them in their geological work.

Comments Carbon dating hoax

  • BBC NEWS Science/Nature Turin shroud 'older than thought'
    Reply

    Jan 31, 2005. The Shroud of Turin is much older than suggested by 1980s radiocarbon dating, a new chemical study suggests. of Turin, Nasa. Tests in 1988 concluded the cloth was a medieval "hoax". The author dismisses 1988 carbon-14 dating tests which concluded that the linen sheet was a medieval fake.…

  • Carbon dating doesn't work -- debunked - YouTube
    Reply

    Sep 23, 2008. Living snails that carbon-date to 2,300 years old, a living seal that was carbon-dated at 1,300 years old, and 8,000-year-old living penguins. Not to mention dinosaur bones that dated to 20,000 years ago. Obviously carbon dating doesn't work, unless you understand it. Here's the explanation that even a.…

  • The Piltdown Hoax Biology Visionlearning
    Reply

    However, the discovery at Piltdown - human skull fragments, ancient mammal bones, and archaic tools - was an elaborate hoax. The Hoax was debunked officially in 1953 on a BBC television show and in 1959 carbon dating technology had reached the point where the bones could be dated more precisely. The skull was.…